This is an era of double standards. Imagine if somebody put out e-cards that said
CELEBRATE MEN!
There would be an uproar about sexism and disrespect for women. The cards would probably be funny and silly, with self-deprecating humor. Of course, you are not going to see such an e-card, because it is so fatuous.

But some websites now have very earnest ads to send e-cards to
celebrate women.
You can guess that the cards are oh so warm, oh so caring, and oh so pompous.


\
Celebrate women? I thought there were already millions of porn sites doing just that.

I saw a toddler wearing a hat that said
I’M IDIOT

Assumedly his mother doesn’t know English.

Or maybe she does.

不幸言中。昨天本blog才提出，作陶的人多非茶瘋，所以作出來的茶具縱有藝術成就，但泡茶功能往往不行。今便看到陶藝雜誌第五十八集，第一屆臺灣金壺獎競賽得獎作品，天啊，得獎盉能用嗎？光看金獎作品，李幸龍的「赤壁」盉，眼睛不舒服：俗艷俗氣，不好拿不好泡；銀獎章、劉作品老套。實用上，我不愛側把、提梁盉。側把，只能倒給自己喝，不大方；提梁，不好清。銅牌作品都是工藝品，甭講泡茶。佳作才有幾把尚可用的盉(盧東川、陳啟南、詹文森)；之外，得獎盉若送給我，我嫌佔空間礙眼。

大失所望。還是宜興獨尊。

A great problem for tea freaks is that most potters are not tea freaks. Potters make tea bowls that may be of very high esthetic value but are useless for making tea. The tea bowls of, for example, Peter Voulkos, are beautiful, but would be the death of any tea. I would as soon drink tea from a Dixie cup as from tea bowls made by Japanese master potters. Some 天目tenmoku bowls made by potters in Taiwan are okay; I have a cup made by 江有亭 that is good for 水仙, but I have yet to see a Japanese tenmoku bowl that you could drink tea out of. In my experience, black glaze, which Japanese potters adore, spells disaster for tea; the point to understand here is that the Japanese tea ceremony is a ceremony, the ceremony predominating over the tea. Frankly, the Japanese haven’t made progress in tea brewing for about a thousand years.

For that matter, allow me to express my astonishment. Online I found a wood-fired tea bowl by a Japanese potter in Kyoto. It was nice, but frankly, in terms of skill, artistic value, and so forth, it would be about average for Taiwan; here I would expect to see it priced around NT$2,000, or say a bit under US$80. I was somewhat surprised to see the price was US$210, but I thought, well, everything’s expensive in Japan. Imagine my surprise when I realized I had missed a zero: the correct price was US$2,100. Ridiculous. I don’t care how romantic or exotic a potter in Kyoto is, that kind of pricing makes no sense at all. And from the looks of it, I would say the bowl was not very good for tea. But Japanese care only about form, not content.

捨我其誰? Taking pottery lessons from 盧展能老師 Teacher Lu, I have been working for several years on making a better tea bowl. I used to drink tea out of small cups, but Teacher Lu showed me that big bowls actually concentrate the smell better. Since then, I have been working on making bowls that fill both hands. Only a bit of tea is poured into the bowl; it is by no means filled to the brim. The point of drinking tea is to enjoy the taste, smell, sound, feel, and look of the tea (ceremony be dammed).

Teacher Lu once asked me if I wanted to make teapots. No. The most important element of a teapot is the clay, and there is simply nothing that can compare with 宜興土 Yixing clay for pots; again, my pots are functional, not decorative. Why make a pot that is inferior to one from Yixing? ~~for the heathen among my readers, allow me to explain that the same tea made in different pots tastes totally different; the same tea made in the same pot tastes totally different in different cups or bowls. Thus the fuss.


I don’t have the clay to make pots, but bowls I can do. I do, I do. I have finally found a form and glaze that works consistently for 普洱 Pu-Erh. You can see more photos on flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/talovich/sets/72157603393019043/

I can’t help myself. Here’s an article from Reuters:
TALLAHASSEE, Florida (Reuters) - The Florida Senate wants public school students to pull up their pants. Lawmakers passed a bill Thursday that could mean suspensions for students with droopy britches.
Florida could join several southern U.S. towns and cities that have passed "saggy pants" laws aimed at outlawing what some teenagers consider a fashion statement -- wearing pants half way down their buttocks, exposing flesh or underwear.
Supporters say schools sometimes don't properly police dress codes and parents are often "under aware" of what their kids are wearing to school.

Suspension is not what they need, they need suspenders. Parents are under aware that everybody is aware of their kids’ underwear.

Good to know the Florida Senate is keeping the world safe for democracy.

Tayal kids don’t wear droopy pants for a simple reason: the elders pants them. ~~ wherever, whenever, in public.

Yeah, wouldn’t you love to do that, too?

Have you ever heard of such a thing as this? On Saturday, a man wins a presidential election by a landslide. Monday morning, the president elect’s wife wakes up at the same time as usual, and, as she has every day for many years, takes the bus to work.

This is what happened this Monday in Taiwan, when President-elect Ma’s wife went to her job at a bank, where she works as a manager. She plans to keep her job, and is negotiating with her security detail about whether she can keep taking the bus. An unemployed Aborigine friend said, “She has held a job for years, she works for her salary, she always takes the bus, and look at how simply she dresses. What about the DPP? VP Lu made fun of us Aborigines when our houses were destroyed by a typhoon, and at the same time she was using tax money to have a luxurious house fixed up for her!”

The day after the election, public opinion polls showed Ma’s popularity topping 80%. The overall mood in Taipei is jubilant. People are looking forward to the future with hope and confidence again. A taxi driver said, “Look at Hong Kong. They are doing good business because of all the tourists from mainland China. But President Chen would not allow tourists to come to Taiwan because he is too selfish. When they lift restrictions, we taxi drivers can make a living again.” (Not all taxi drivers are so optimistic. Before the election, some taxi drivers held a rally to support the DPP. They stressed over and over again for tv news, “We aren’t getting paid for this! We are volunteers!” It’s an open secret that most of the ‘demonstrators’ in DPP mob scenes are bussed in and paid: money, boxed meal, sometimes caps and T shirts.)

President Chen is apparently making plans for the transition. Facing charges of corruption, he has promised that he will go to court, and that he will not skedaddle. He is making plans for that, too. Today the President’s Office purchased….. 57 (fifty seven) paper shredders.

All in all, I would describe the mood in Taipei this way: a young woman mistakenly marries a man, only to discover that he is narcissistic, with love only for himself, none for her. After unhappy years of forbearance and suffering, she finally divorces him. He insists it is all her fault, and that he has done nothing wrong. She looks back and said, “I must have been blind! How could I have fallen for that creep? Now it’s time to grow and to get on with my life.”

But who’s getting custody of all those paper shredders?

Overheard on the bus to Wulai

國中男生甲：聰明的你是原住民…可是你父母離婚了！

國中男生乙：聰明的你是原住民…可是你媽媽啃狗骨頭！

Jr high school Tayal boy 1: Intelligent you are an aborigine… but your parents got divorced!

Jr high school Tayal boy 2: Intelligent you are an aborigine… but your mother gnaws dog bones!

People will increasingly interact with computers using speech or touch screens rather than keyboards, Microsoft Corp. Chairman Bill Gates said.

I’m not sure how good that is. I assume you are at a computer now.

Which is closer to your hands, your keyboard or your screen?

Typing has its advantages, and some day I may even get rid of my QWERTY keyboard. Speech includes a lot of hemming and hawing, which typing reduces. For me, I think it would be easier and quicker to revise a written sentence than to go back and say, OK, delete that mmm let’s see now.

I don’t want to hold my hands up to the screen for too long. What I would like to see is a foot mouse, or something practical so I can type and use my mouse without removing my hands from the keyboard.

(confession: before I wrote that, I paused for a moment to think, how do you spell QWERTY? …. Oh.)

反省與成見

民進黨慘敗。我看綠色黨報，一板標題：

要反省要改革

陳水扁講改革講了幾年？曾見錙銖改革嗎？民進黨的一個問題是，死不認錯，一切都是別人不對、別人的錯。好，姑且不談，翻到下一板，大字標題：

帥哥效應 馬當選 專拉婦女票

(正確字眼忘了)。這叫做反省嗎？深綠重男輕女，這不是新聞；我認識的民進黨男黨員，清一色大男人主義，還沒看過一個例外。所以他們大概很容易找到一個結論，謝蘇落選，不是人民對陳政、勝偉榮、亂局、分化、經濟衰敗的不滿，而是女人無才，不會用大腦，看到帥哥就迷住了。是不是太藐視臺灣的女性？

在美國，民主黨的象徵是驢、共和黨的象徵是象。我建議民進黨，黨的象徵可以用死鴨子。

Liberation
It’s amazing what a difference a couple weeks can make. When I went to Boston on January 3, Taiwan was still afflicted by very untypical melancholy. The economy was down, horizons were down, expectations were down, hopes were down, spirits were down; very untypical of the Taiwan I know and love so well.

While I was in Boston, elections were held for the national legislature, and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party of President Chen got slaughtered. When I returned at the end of the month, I was happy to see people returning to normal. I would say the difference was that once again people were looking forward to the future with hope and confidence.

During his eight years in office, Chen has worked hard to build strife, polarity, and confrontation. I have always felt that the DPP is a reaction against the modernization of Taiwan. People who are puzzled by the modern world and the changes brought about by leaving the farm flock to the DPP banner to fight against what they cannot change. They yearn to retreat to the simple days when Taiwan was agricultural, isolated, poor, and ruled by Japanese imperialists; no decisions or adaptations required, just do as your father did before you (or your husband orders you to do.)

Chen’s great failure was that he never tried to be President of all Taiwan; he wanted to be president only of his most loyal followers, and to chastise the rest. Example: many ROC citizens who live abroad came back to vote; the DPP said that anybody who returns from abroad to vote for the KMT ‘不是人, is not a human being,’ a very serious insult in Chinese. (aside: one of the DPP’s most acerbic supporters lives in Japan; she came back to vote for the DPP, which shows she ‘loves Taiwan’ and when the DPP lost the election, vowed to become a Japanese citizen; again, this proves that she ‘loves Taiwan.’ During the presidential campaign, rather than discuss issues concretely, the DPP made a huge fuss of the fact that the KMT candidate Ma, who earned a PhD in Law from Harvard, once had a Permanent Resident visa [green card] in the US even though it lapsed years ago; nobody mentioned that the first DPP candidate to run for president, Peng Mingmin, had a valid US green card visa while he ran.)

Because of these failings, the DPP has tried to isolate Taiwan from the rest of the world, and pretend that the world revolves around Taiwan. Everybody knows the economy of mainland China (PRC) is booming, right? So you would think clever Taiwan business people would be raking in more money than anybody else, since it’s the same country in all but politics; same people, same language, same customs, and so forth, with only minor differences. But Chen has placed restrictions on Taiwan investment in the PRC, and direct flights to mainland China are still forbidden. This has caused a massive movement of the best and brightest; there are a million Taiwan business people (out of a total population of 23 million) in the PRC.

The economy has suffered a great deal under Chen’s incompetence. I don’t understand economics, but someone who does explained to me that when Chen took office, the Treasury was fat and full; now the Treasury is deep in debt. Chen, who accomplished nothing for the people of Taiwan during his terms in office, faces a wide spectrum of charges of corruption once his Presidential immunity expires, but he has promised that he won’t run away. For what his promises are worth. He always called for reform while he was campaigning. A few years into his first term, headlines trumpeted, 陳：總統可以不做，一定要改革 Chen: I can give up the presidency, but we have to reform! A few weeks later, headlines announced, 陳：不需要改革 Chen: We don’t need reform. So take his promises for what they’re worth. Maybe a wooden nickel for eight years’ of promises?

Ma, very sensibly, plans to deal with the PRC so our suffering economy may benefit. The DPP tried to work on people’s fears. They posted slogans saying that the Taiwan market will be flooded with mainland agricultural products. Great, said Taipei consumers, this will give us an even better variety of food, and allow Taiwan farmers to specialize and develop into high price bracket produce. But rural farmers were told their markets would be taken away, so in today’s presidential election, the DPP carried only the most rural, least educated areas.

Not that the DPP didn’t try. They plastered Taipei with the slogan, Five Million Engineers Will Come From the PRC! That cracked me up, the idea of a vast infestation of nerds with pocket protectors engineering in every nook and cranny of Taiwan. But I agree with the summation of Lian Chan (the KMT candidate in the previous, highly suspicious, presidential election): “長昌不提政策；欺騙、恐嚇臺灣人民；不講經濟，只恐嚇、污辱臺灣人民 the DPP candidates did not bring out any policies; they just cheated and threatened the people of Taiwan. They did not discuss the economy, they just threatened and insulted the people of Taiwan.”

The DPP fought desperately to agitate and play on fears. People here see that Hong Kong’s economy is booming because of tourism from the PRC, and Taiwan is a much better destination for tourists, so at the beginning of the campaign, the DPP cautioned, If PRC tourists come, their prostitutes will too, and they will put our prostitutes out of work! That didn’t go over so well.

Another DPP slogan displeased me: “We need solidarity; don’t let Taiwan become a second Tibet.” The DPP has constantly worked to destroy solidarity and to provoke the PRC. If Taiwan were to become a second Tibet, it would be the fault of the right-wing DPP.

Predictably, the election was a landslide for the KMT, with 58% of the vote (something I think I mentioned before is that Chen Shui Bian has never won a majority in any election; any time he won, it was because the KMT split its votes between candidates. His highest record was about 42% of the popular vote.)

The thugs are leaving office, and we are getting new slogans. When victory was assured, Ma’s people put up signs saying, 感恩之心， 從謙卑做作起; with our hearts full of gratitude, we begin with humility. Ma did not encourage his supporters to celebrate; he said, "We have to roll up our sleeves and get to work. Five million people voted against me, so I have to work hard to win their faith, because I am to be the president of all of the people of Taiwan." What a welcome change!

The presidential election in Taiwan is coming tomorrow, and I can guarantee that it will be won by a member of the KMT. That is because the DPP’s candidate Hsieh evidently still holds on to his membership in the KMT, even though he is Chairman of the right-wing Democratic Progressive Party, which may have been named by George Orwell.

Hsieh most recently got wiped out in his bid for Mayor of Taipei; his main plank in that race was to hold the Olympics in Taipei. Politics aside, I cannot imagine the Olympic Committee even considering a place that may get typhoons every week throughout the summer. But the idea was, voters were supposed to fall for that, or else be judged guilty of Not Loving Taiwan, the fate of all those who do not obey DPParty line. Sorry, that may work down in rural areas of the south, but not in Taipei; his opponent Hao won in a landslide. More recently, the DPP got slaughtered in the Legislature election in January, winning only 25 seats out of about 115. People are sick of DPP’s incompetence, divisiveness, and contrariness.

Hsieh is the disciple of an unsavory character called 7 Power Sung. In the 1990s, Hsieh’s wife arranged for the photography of a bunch of double exposure photos of Sung, which the gullible were shown as proof that Sung had supernatural powers and could project himself to several places at once, so donate while you have the chance! Hsieh had himself filmed kneeling down and kowtowing to Sung, swearing to be his loyal disciple. Sung eventually got charged with fraud, swindling, and so forth, but the charges haven’t stuck. Maybe once the DPP is out of power, that may change.

Journalists also dug up proof that twenty years ago, Hsieh was a paid informer for the Bureau of Investigation, spying on the DPP. But I suppose that just goes to show that he Loves Taiwan.

While the KMT candidate Ma is trying to discuss the economy, education, relations with the PRC, the environment, and other vital issues, Hsieh’s campaign is mudslinging with all the vigor they can muster. Much has been made of the fact that Ma once had a green card, the visa for permanent residence in the US. So what? That just shows that he gave up opportunities to work in the US to come back and work in Taiwan. The DPP is really desperate when after eight years in office, all they can campaign on is the guy’s expired visa. Actually, I think it’s too bad Ma let it expire; no high ROC officials can get visas to the US, but if Ma already had one, he could go and work very effectively for Taiwan. Ma’s command of English is better than a lot of Americans’; President Chen can barely speak comprehensible Mandarin.

(Hours before voting begins, Hsieh is still harping on that green card. He’s saying, “The visa lapsed, but he could renew it!” ….is it that important?)

The DPP’s latest attack was a fabricated allegation that forty years ago when Mrs Ma was a student at Harvard, she stole a newspaper from the school library. Oh horrors!

(Frumpy Mrs Hsieh appeared on TV news yesterday trying to high-5 supporters; she kept missing. But she did very well on the Thumbs Up. She got it right both times on the first try.)

Hsieh’s campaign is hampered also by the incumbent President Chen, who has held back progress for Taiwan in eight years of power. People are saying that Chen has 鎖國 locked off the country in isolation, as Japan did under the Shogun. Ministers (equivalent to American Secretaries) come and go so often and so ineffectually that people barely bother to keep track anymore of who is in office. The only Minister to keep power year after year is President Chen’s lightning rod, Professor Du, the widely detested Minister of Education. Among Du’s contributions to education have been the recommendation that all maps be turned 90 degrees counterclockwise, so that Taiwan is on top of mainland China. He is also noted for openly picking his nose during a hearing of the national legislature. It is said that he will be charged with corruption once he leaves office.

Du appointed Vice Minister of Education a certain Professor Chuang, who takes an infantile delight in saying dirty words in press conferences. You have to understand that the respect Chinese tradition pays educators also imposes high standards for conduct; the best analogy I can make is that people in Taiwan expect teachers to behave sort of like Americans expect Protestant ministers to behave. Chuang finally took his dirty words too far, slurring KMT candidate Ma; in the resulting firestorm, Chuang said he would rather resign than apologize. He has done both, and his old university has been inundated with demands from students, peers, and alumnae that they not let him back to his old position.

Even though the DPP are noted for the astringency and adamancy of their views, the little guy is hurting after eight years of DPP rule. A friend of mine, a very low income Tayal Aborigine, put it very well: “The DPP says the KMT was corrupt. I don’t know, but under the Blue (the KMT) we had jobs and pay was good. The Green (DPP) is rotten with corruption, and we don’t have any jobs or any pay.”

Signs indicate change. A year ago I went on an errand to the most deeply conservative area of Taipei (maybe the most solidly right wing area of central or northern Taiwan), on the West Side near the old Circle (大稻珵). The place I visited was festooned with DPP banners, photos and posters of President Chen, slogans, and so forth. But as I said, that area is noted as being the most reactionary part of Taipei, so I was not surprised. What surprised me was that this year, I went to the same place again, and all the banners, photos, and other paraphernalia had been taken down. Same people, same management, but the walls had been repainted in blue.

Be that as it may, I hope the KMT is aware that they are facing total defeat at the polls tomorrow. Why do I know that? Because DPP party faithful have assured me that Hsieh will win 80% of the popular vote tomorrow. What’s more, the DPP put a psychic on tv news, and she said Hsieh would win by a landslide, thereby “結束亂局: putting an end to chaos” (the chaos being eight years of DPP rule, I guess). But the psychic must be right, because on tv news she was wearing a rosary, so that proves that she can predict the future. What? You aren’t convinced? What’s the matter with you? You must Not Love Taiwan!

Last fall the Bean Regime of President Chen started a big push to hold a referendum to join the UN. Chen was boosted into power with help from the far-right wing, the reactionary Taiwan independence movement, and they seem to have pushed Chen to do something, so his plan is to use this referendum as a sneaky method to proclaim Taiwan independent; the right wing in Taiwan specializes in believing only what they wish to be true. As the UN does not want Taiwan to join, the referendum can serve no purpose, but Chen is big on referendums, especially when they can divide public opinion.

The referendum has exasperated the US State Department and provoked mainland China (the PRC), but it has not divided public opinion in Taiwan very well. Nobody but reactionary die-hards want the referendum.

Lavishly spending tax money, the regime printed thousands of banners to be placed outside all government offices, advertising a vote in favor of the DPP position in the referendum. Most of the signs are supposed to be in English, but the problem is, nobody can figure out what the signs actually say: UN FOR TAIWAN PEACE FOREVER. What does “UN for Taiwan” mean? Somebody’s giving the UN to Taiwan? English teachers seethe; “All they had to do before they spent all that money was pick up a phone and ask any English teacher!! Any junior high school English teacher could have told them it’s not a good slogan!” As if we don’t have enough trouble teaching English as it is!

Government delegations going abroad were ordered to festoon themselves with the slogan and related propaganda. The slogan also was stamped on envelopes, without consent. I protested, saying that A, it’s a lousy slogan, and B, the regime should not be marking private letters with their propaganda; if the chop had said, VOTE IN THE REFERENDUM, I would have given it my whole-hearted approval, but it is wrong to tell people how to vote. I wrote about this on this blog:
http://talovich.blogspot.com/2007_10_01_archive.html#5653781429099146387
It worked, got a lot of coverage on television and all over the press, and the chops disappeared. I have been thanked many times by many strangers who recognized me from television, as recently as this afternoon. (What amazes me about the whole thing is that anybody actually reads my blog!)

I noticed that after the first couple days of the campaign, at a large number of government offices the banners have been shunted off to one side and turned around backwards. So far, of all the people I have discussed this matter with, I have found only three people who strongly support Bean’s referendum. Of these, two are men from Taiwan who live in the US, and the third went to great lengths to explain to me that he has renounced his Taiwan citizenship and carries a US passport. It’s just wonderful how the people who shout their love of Taiwan the most loudly are those who do their best not to live here.

Even my far-right-wing friends skirt the issue, and change the topic when the UN comes up. Efforts are still being made to ram this through; apparently old people are being led to believe that if the referendum passes, Taiwan will automatically gain UN membership and they will no longer need visas for travel to any country in the world. But essentially it is a dead baby. If the referendum comes anywhere near passing, suspect that somebody has been up to something funny with the ballot boxes. The referendum has so little support that even President Bean is trying to get it off his hands. Only the extreme right wing wants anything to do with this.

Isn’t that funny? In the US, the far right wants out of the UN, but in Taiwan, the far right wants in.

Recently on this blog I have mentioned my neighbor, the 臺灣藍鵲 Taiwan Blue Magpie, or sibekay in Tayal, a shy, reclusive but beautiful bird that comes to our neighborhood mostly in cool weather. They are very difficult to photograph, but recently they have discovered that my dogs spill kibbles all over the place when they eat, so the birds have been frequenting my back door. Yesterday I spotted some birds slipping close to the food. I rushed to get my camera, inside the house. Just as I got to the window to photograph them, Byajing came charging up, and I almost got photographs of six sibekay fleeing from my beautiful doggie. Almost.

This afternoon shortly after two, as I was preparing to leave for the city to teach, I heard the blue magpies again, but they sounded anxious. Grabbing my camera, I went out to the balcony, to see a group of three in a tree to my northeast, and a larger group in another big tree straight south. Just as I prepared to photograph the trio, a large hawk, or kestrel, sailed south off my roof. Evidently it had been right on my roof. As it sailed south, the magpies scattered. The hawk perched in a tree. Two magpies flew over and perched in the same tree, but higher. They kept close to the hawk.

Magpies fly slowly, encumbered by their beautiful long tail feathers. These hawks fly so fast I rarely see them. Once one flew right by a guest and me; my guest was not even aware that a large hawk had flown right in front of us. You can understand, then, that hawks hunt magpies, which is why the flock was so nervous.

As those two magpies kept up the pressure on the hawk, most of the magpies flew off to the southwest. After several minutes, those two sentries followed the flock, and immediately, two more magpies, from the tree to my northeast flew over to take guard over the hawk. They flew closer and closer to it, squawking. Finally, about ten minutes after the confrontation began, the hawk called it quits, and flew away to the southeast. The magpies flew off to the southwest.

I had never seen such an encounter. I took a lot of photos, which I am posting on my Sibekay set on flickr:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/talovich/sets/72157604065896125/
My friend Bird Lai, a noted birder and superb photographer, says I should get a better camera. He has a point.

Bird’s photos and blog are at:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wildfun
http://blog.xuite.net/wild.fun/blog/16077143




can you see the hawk? It is level with the lower magpie, which is looking at it.

民進黨有一方面勝過國民黨：看總統、副總統候選人，可以十分肯定地說，民進黨絕對不是以臉蛋選人。謝先生「笑」容看起來一點也不歡喜，比較像滿口利牙闔不攏嘴。在美國，有人問我，「臺灣男人都長得那麼醜嗎？」我否認，解釋說，民進黨只有這些。貌與才未必成比，可是要選政長，該選個有氣質的、國際上站出來不會太丟臉的；謝蘇站出來，外國可能以為是總統的司機與維修禮車的工人：缺乏氣勢、威嚴。

(圖:國民黨年輕的謝同志)

前不久一封email很好笑：小叮噹臺灣政治板，臺灣政要配小叮噹人物：謝長廷=尖酸勢利奸詐的阿福，一語道破。而馬英久呢？=宜靜。這也十分貼切。我個人不喜歡漂亮男生，我同意Joyce Cary所說，「I never liked pretty boys. A man’s face should be for use in battering at the world, and show the scars for it.」可是起碼有個樣，國際上站出來不會太丟臉的。

以貌取人，國民黨「看好」，可是肢體語言，國民黨贏；我本以新烏路的旗幟為參攷，後來馬蕭的旗幟全部被人偷走：可能太喜歡，帶回家觀賞珍藏。但是原先看到的，馬蕭身微欠，半舉拳，平易近人，很有精神，很積極。謝蘇背對背，雙手臂交疊胸前，頭稍後傾；兩個人相背，雙臂封胸剛愎自用，傲視選民。

阿福、宜靜，選哪一個呢？

Another rising politician’s career has ended because of S-E-X. I am referring, of course, to New York’s Governor Client9, who resigned because he had been cavorting with a prostitute.

Face it, it’s human nature, men who have strong drives for power and prominence also have trouble keeping their pants on.

My main complaint about Governor Client9 was the prostitution; paying for it was stupid all the way around the block. Now is not the time to ponder about any differences that may or may not exist between politicians and prostitutes; a public official who supports prostitution is as bad as one who plays golf; neither belong in office.

Clinton didn’t pay, but the Oval Office is not the place for that. In his case, I believe his worst offense was bad taste. Monica??

But ok, let’s grow up, man who hunger for political power also have trouble keeping their pants on. The stance should be, Don’t ask, don’t tell.

But if the US is so all-fired free and open about what the Marines call ‘dipping the wick,’ let’s just face human nature and add a harem to the White House. This progressive viewpoint was first presented on this very blog, on May 31, 2006:

http://talovich.blogspot.com/2006_05_01_archive.html#114914541298156154

But when all is said and done, the person I really feel sorry for is the governor’s wife.

And I can tell you one more thing: Clients 1 through 8 must be worried!

紐約州長嫖妓被發現，新聞業者、共和黨諠譁，一般選民反應不強烈，可是州長自己覺得作錯了很可恥，對不起大家，所以幾天之內向大眾道歉、引咎辭職。

昔年臺北街上百萬人，要陳總統下台，完全不理睬，講了幾段調侃話；最近發表任期結束會面對司法，不會落跑。如此而已，之外對國民、對民主，毫無交代。

In our enlightened age, toilets are separated by sex. We have come a long way from the Glory of Rome, when everybody squatted together and passed around the sponge.

I assume toilets are separated by sex for – let us not utter that scorned, forbidden word morality – but for the comfort of those involved, so bodily functions are not exposed to the scrutiny of those with different body parts, and to reduce sexual harassment.

All very well and good, but I do not like being ogled by homosexuals when I encounter them in public toilets. Distinctly uncomfortable to try to empty your bladder when the guy at the next urinal keeps leaning over trying to peek and make conversation.

If homosexuals have rights, don’t we? Oh great, I can see where this is going: all public buildings will be equipped with separate toilets for straight males, straight females, homosexual males, homosexual females, bisexuals (can they all go together?), transvestites, and the transgendered. Just as well the Imperial Eunuchs are all dead, or else we’d have to put in toilets for them too.

全世界，除了中國人，沒有人認為西藏屬于中國。全世界，大家仰慕達賴喇嘛。可是如果藏人在拉薩要求西藏獨立，中共鎮壓，全世界沒人敢吭聲。頂多瑞典求北京讓他們到勞改營看被關的人。

全世界，除了部份極右派本省人，沒有人認為臺灣不屬于中國。全臺灣執政黨，沒有一個在國際上有聲望，大家只求陳呂李不要再鬧。其它，不夠看；只能演給本地人看，不能帶出去讓別人笑話。

前不久又有人跟我說，臺灣出事的話美軍馬上來救。這夢何時醒？

一九七九年，韓國總朴正熙被自己的保鑣開四鎗殺死，一時大新聞。

曾聽過一位算命先生討論此事，說，「測字便知朴總統見害于自己保鑣；何以知之乎？朴正熙，你看那『熙』字呀，不是剛好暗示這個遭遇嗎？熙者，臣己也，自己臣子謀害囉！」

聽者問，「那麼那熙字下的四點呢？」

算命先生悠然伸出右手，作手槍狀，說，「砰！砰！砰！砰！四槍。」

We have been playing merry games.

As I reported on March 7, the sibekay (臺灣藍鵲, or Taiwan Blue Magpie, Urocissa caerulea)is a very shy, very sensitive bird; so much as look at them and flit, they’re off. I once met some birdwatchers who had been coming to Wulai for ten years and had never seen the sibekay (although I should note that they are more plentiful than before. The sibekay, I mean, although there may be more birders. That I do not know.)

My dogs are sloppy eaters (甚麼樣的人養甚麼樣的狗) so there is frequently a scattering of kibbles out by the back door when they have finished eating. The sibekay have discovered this, so they sneak down to eat the kibbles after the dogs eat. Thus the game. The sibekay try to eat the dogfood without being detected, I try to take photos of the sibekay without being detected, and the dogs try to chase away the birds before I can take photos. I can hardly shout at the dogs, because that would scare the birds away immediately. 繼續努力吧!

Here you see Yumin glaring at the sibekay in the tree, which is coyly looking the other way.

In From Dawn to Decadence, Jacques Barzun writes, “A well-known figure, Joseph Caillaux, had been the one statesman in France working for a good understanding with Germany; he had defused a grave crisis by yielding unimportant holdings in Africa. A newspaper violently opposed to his policy began to cast discredit on him as a man by publishing (stolen) love letters of his to his wife…. Without his knowledge, Mme Caillaux went to the newspaper office, spoke with the editor-in-chief demanding that the publication stop, and when he refused drew from her handbag a revolver and shot him dead. Incidentally, the editor she killed, Gaston Clamette, had been helping Proust to get his novel published.

“Mme Caillaux was acquitted, but the jury had a hard time.” If I had been on the jury, I would not have had a hard time at all: Clamette had been helping Proust get his novel published? Justifiable homicide, acquitted, next case please.